Is Someone Else Pasting Exit Pop-Ups on Your Webpage?
Tonight, I was horrified when someone sent me a link to software — called Link Swiper — that he thought was great.
I skimmed the sales page (it’s a WSO – Warrior Special Offer) and couldn’t figure out what the product did. There was almost no text on the page, just a headline, a blurb, and a video.
So, I watched the sales video, and my stomach lurched. (The video is at the foot of this page, if you want to see it.)
Basically, here’s how Link Swiper works:
1. The person who buys “Link Swiper” uses it to create a cloaked link to someone else’s webpage… the link points to any webpage with good, interesting content.
2. That “Link Swiper” owner posts the cloaked link “all over the Internet.” He’ll post it at forums, in social media, etc. (If you’re wondering why someone would go to all that trouble, you’re about to find out.)
3. Next, someone comes along, sees the link at a forum or social media (or wherever it was posted) and clicks on that link. He or she lands at the recommended webpage. So far, so good. It’s probably a pretty good page, or it wouldn’t have been used as bait.
4. Finally, when the visitor clicks to leave that webpage, he or she will see an exit pop-up. It’s some kind of ad or a request to join a mailing list, or something like that.
Here’s the sleazy part: The pop-up was placed there — via some clever linking code — by the person who bought the “Link Swiper” software… not the website owner. (In fact, the website owner probably has no idea what’s going on.)
I don’t know about you, but when I visit a website and they won’t let me leave without clicking out of a pop-up ad, I mentally note that URL and generally don’t go back there. Pop-ups of any kind, but especially exit pop-ups, are a sales tactic (or list-building tactic) that I don’t like.
I never link to a site that has an exit pop-up. To me, it looks crass beyond belief.
So, how would you feel if someone visited your site and left with a bad impression of you? And what if it went on for months, and you didn’t realize it?
That could happen. “Link Swiper” makes it possible.
I’ve watched the video twice. The second time was to note the one thing that makes that sleazy linking tactic not work: If your website uses frame-breaking technology.
Back in the old HTML days, we used to routinely add frame-breaking code to our websites. That was to prevent bad code from (usually accidentally) making our pages show up in the previous site’s frame.
Today, I’m not sure what to do to protect a WordPress from this kind of tactic. So far, I think a WordPress plugin like Break Out of Frames or WP No Frames will solve the problem… but I’m not 100% sure, yet.
Meanwhile, you need to know that this nasty little linking tactic is being sold as the best thing since sliced bread. (Well, hey, that’s how they sell products, right…?)
Though the likelihood of your site being the target of this kind of ruse is slim… well, the better your content, the more vulnerable you are. After all, these jerks are looking for genuinely good content to lure people into their snares.
Since I just spotted this ugly little “link swiper” tonight, I don’t have much else to say… yet. For now, at least you know this product is on the market, and I recommend taking steps to keep it from hijacking your website visitors and spoiling your reputation.
By the way, the guy is selling an OTO (One-Time Offer) to his customers, called “super stealth link cloaking.” It’s described as something that “…allows you to put in your own stealth subdomains for each link you create. Making them look more like the content site you are sending traffic to. Very slick.”
Seriously… he calls this slick? I have less polite words for it.
And, oh yes, I’m leaving the mailing list of every person who recommends Link Swiper to me. Clearly, they’re more interested in profits than playing fair, online.
Here’s the sales video, if my explanation wasn’t clear. (Sorry, I threw this article together, in haste.)

Eibhlin,
What you may not realize is that this is the current trend for offering up new products, not just Nick Jolin’s product. Rob Jones has one called Trustjacker that does the same thing, but is a WordPress plugin, where as Nick’s is a desktop app. Then, you will find Internet Corporation that has a product called Link Jacker. However, I think Link Jacker performs a little differently, in that it serves up your content as FB posts, but still on the same premise of benefiting from YOUR hard work! (NOTE: All of these are currently for offer on the WF, I believe, unless Rob’s has closed recently.) I doubt that we have seen the last of this concept for a while.
I suspect that the next trend will be for someone to come up with a WordPress plugin that somehow prevents someone from hijacking your valuable content (to counteract the damage that could be done from these types of products). Round and round we go, where it stops…nobody knows! What can I say…is that it is all done in the name of the Almighty $$$.
Lanita,
Thanks for the comment!
I agree. Trustjacker bothered me, and that WSO is currently closed… again. The sales page doesn’t say what it does. It’s just testimonials, with other people talking about what it does. (Deftly side-stepping any FTC liabilities.) That’s a product with some serious credibility issues.
I hadn’t known about Link Jacker, and it’s an even worse example. Seriously, in the demo video, the guy is proudly showing how he can make money by pasting his pop-up on Wikipedia…?
That’s disgusting. I’m checking the endorsements and positive reviews for these products, and I’m making a list of their usernames. They’re people whose products — and even their endorsements — would be a big red flag on anything I was even thinking of buying.
Like you, I’m wondering where this will stop. The “jacker” portion of these product names is, of course, a clue that they know they’re doing something that — in real life — would be illegal in many countries. If someone were to visit a storefront and paste their own ads all over that store’s windows, arrest would be imminent.
I can shrug at that. For me, the reputation damage is worrisome. However, an equal concern is when a website visitor — unaware of these sleazy tactics — doesn’t realize that the pop-up is owned by someone without the credibility or reputation of the actual website owner. The visitor innocently signs up for whatever-it-is in the pop-up, lands on a mailing list, and then his or her email is sold to countless other spammers and sleazes.
History has shown that this happens, time and again, when a movement (such as the Internet) starts out with high ideals and — by the time we’re well into the Diffusion of Innovations curve — well, we may have to expand the definition of “laggards” to reference the lowest moral code, as well.
People will figure these things out, and learn to identify shady marketing techniques. Meanwhile, pop-up blockers and frame breakers are two useful tools.
Thanks again for your comment. I knew there were some pretty bad products sold as WSOs, but I didn’t realize it was that bad.
Sincerely,
Eibhlin
Well, Eibhlin, I posted on the 12th. “I suspect that the next trend will be for someone to come up with a WordPress plugin that somehow prevents someone from hijacking your valuable content (to counteract the damage that could be done from these types of products)”…
Take a look at this thread on the WF! LOL
Now, I haven’t read the thread yet, but well… have a look! LOL
BTW…it’s NOT an affiliate link, just didn’t want you to have to search for it.